Posts in Year: 2009
Hernandez v. City of Pomona — AGC Senior Partner Obtains Important Victory in California Supreme Court
Alvarez-Glasman & Colvin is proud to announce that Senior Partner Roger A. Colvin recently obtained an important victory in the California Supreme Court case, Hernandez et al. v. City of Pomona et al.[1] Hernandez et al. v. City of Pomona et al.[1] The decision, handed.
Read MoreAGC Releases Article on Solar Rights Laws
Alvarez-Glasman & Colvin has released an article concerning two laws that are critical to future development of solar energy in California: the Solar Rights Act and the Solar Shade Control Act. The article, entitled, “Solar Rights and Shade in California,” summarizes these laws, their impact.
Read MoreAGC Successfully Defends Local Assessment District from Prop. 218 Challenge
Alvarez-Glasman & Colvin Partner Scott E. Nichols successfully defended the City of Pomona’s downtown business assessment district against a Proposition 218 challenge. In Dahms v. City of Pomona, the Court of Appeal affirmed its prior decision in favor of the City after remand from the.
Read MoreAGC Wins Case Based on Unique Tort Claims Act Argument
Alvarez-Glasman & Colvin’s Senior Partner, Roger A. Colvin, along with AGC Partner Rick R. Olivarez, recently obtained summary judgment in favor of the firm’s client, the City of Pico Rivera, in a breach of contract action which was filed in the Norwalk Superior Court. Mr..
Read MoreDecision Clarifies What the Term “Residing” Means for Purposes of Sexual Offender Registration Requirements
In the legal world, the precise meaning of a word can have a dramatic impact on a case. This is especially true when it comes to regulating sex offenders. In a recent case, the California Court of Appeal clarified a key term concerning sex offender.
Read More